Monday, 17 October 2016

Ontario Tiger Beetles

Ghost Tiger Beetle (Cicindela lepida)
Photo: Canadian Biodiversity Information Facility

The Norfolk Sandplain, my home turf, hosts 10 of Ontario's 14 tiger beetle (family Cicindelidae) species. Any outing during the warm months means an encounter with at least a few of these fascinating and beautiful beetles; whether it's a concentrated search for one of the province's rarest species, the Ghost Tiger Beetle (Cicindela lepida), or a pleasant afternoon on the Lake Erie shore swimming and watching Beach (Cicindela hirticollis) and Bronzed (Cicindela repanda) Tiger Beetles stalking the sand, Cicindelids will be there. To help me keep my tiger beetles straight, I've put together a simple field guide that will aid in the identification of all Ontario species. The pictures come from the Canadian Biodiversity Information Facility.

Tuesday, 16 August 2016

BioBrevia: In Living Reef Colour

Giant Carpet Anemone (Stichodactyla gigantea), seen here with one of its typical symbiotic partners, the Common Clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris)

William Saville-Kent worked widely in Australian waters, but found his greatest scientific and artisitc interests in tropical coral reefs, particularly the Great Barrier, off the Queensland coast. The Giant Carpet Anemone (Stichodactyla gigantea), seen here with one of its typical symbiotic partners, the Common Clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris), was originally named for Saville-Kent as Discosoma kenti, so it was only fitting that he devoted an entire plate to it in his groundbreaking 1893 book The Great Barrier Reef of Australia: its Products and Potentialities. The book was notable for being the first major scientific work to use photography for documenting nature. The black and white photographs are great, but it is his wonderful illustrations that really bring the book to life. Saville-Kent was the first to capture the truly breathtaking, the absolutely flabbergasting, and the singularly bizarre colour schemes of reef organisms. The colours of Saville-Kent's animals are no exageration, as anyone who has dived or snorkeled on a tropical reef knows, nature spared nothing when colouring the animals of the world's coral seas. Here's just a sampling of some of the beautifully detailed plates from The Great Barrier Reef:






Tuesday, 9 August 2016

Naturescape: Blue Dasher

An immature Blue Dasher (Pachydiplax longipennis).
Photo: Mark Conboy

Monday, 8 August 2016

Naturescape: Sonoran Desert

Beautiful colours adorn the parched landscape of Arizona's Sonoran Desert at sunset.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Sunday, 7 August 2016

Naturescape: Prairie Rattlesnake

A Prairie Rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis) on the southeastern Alberta prairie.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Saturday, 6 August 2016

Naturescape: Mountain Goat

A nannie and kid Mountain Goat (Oreamnos americanus) lick minerals in Jasper National Park, Alberta.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Friday, 5 August 2016

The False Allure of Garlic Mustard

The West Virginia White (Pieris virginiensis) is highly localized in Ontario. This one is nectaring on a non-native mustard. The presence of non-native mustards is partly responsible for the decline of the this woodland butterfly across much of its range.
Photo: Randy L. Emmitt (Wikimedia Commons)

Eastern Onatrio's Frontenac Arch is home to a wide variety of species at risk, including an unassuming woodland butterfly, the West Virginia White (Pieris virginiensis). It's a butterfly that's notable for a number of reasons: it's truly sylvatic, whereas almost all other Ontario butterflies are found in open habitats; it's restricted to only a handful locations in the province, and it has apparently disappeared from many of those sites in recent years; and perhaps most importantly, it has a taste for mustards (family Brassicaceae). It's a combination of all three of these things that has earned the West Virginia White the designation of a species of special concern in Ontario.

I have fond memories of living among West Virginia Whites, which I could find flying in May only a short bike ride away from my cabin on Opinicon Lake. My favourite West Virginia White colony, was found under a forest canopy composed of some thirty species of trees, where salamanders seemed to reside under every fallen log, and spring wildflowers bloomed in ridiculous profusion. Among the abundant wildflowers were two toothworts: Cut-leaved (Cardamine concatenata) and  Two-leaved (Cardamine diphylla), and it was upon these forest floor mustards that my West Virginia Whites fed. It's been several years since I last had the opportunity to visit my old colony, but I wonder with genuine concern how those rare butterflies are fairing.

In the past, the most pressing threat to West Virginia White populations throughout Ontario would have been loss or fragmentation of the mature forest habitat they and the toothworts require. Happily, my colony was safe from any kind of forestry, tucked away as it was on a large swath of protected land. The there was something else to worry about back then, in those heady days with my butterfly colony, and it's a worry that persists today: the insidious Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata).

Garlic Mustard was intentionally introduced to North American from Europe as an edible herb during the mid 1800's. It has since expanded across the Great Lakes region and throughout much of the northeastern United States. Once established, it spreads like wildfire, choking out native vegetation and turning large areas of forest understory into Garlic Mustard monocultures. It's a terribly invasive species, more deserving of the appellation "weed" than almost any other woodland plant.

Just like the toothworts, Garlic Mustard is a member of the family Brassicaceae, the mustards. The mustard family includes such human favorites such as Broccoli, Cabbage and Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea), Turnip (Brassica rapa), Canola (Brassica napus), Common Radish (Raphanus sativus) and Horseradish (Armoracia rusticana). Many of these garden species are popular foodplants for introduced Cabbage White (Pieris rapaecaterpillars, but for West Virginia Whites the options are fewer because not many mustards grow in its dark forest habitat. The toothworts do and, unfortunately, so does Garlic Mustard. Indeed, I've spent more time than I care to recall pulling up Garlic Mustard in my woodlot. It's an annual chore, but it works to keep the forest floor more or less free of the nefarious weed. I fear however, that no one has been pulling Garlic Mustard at the old colony I used to visit years ago, and that may be cause for concern.

Garlic Mustard can out-compete the native toothworts for sunlight and soil nutrients, effectively eliminating them from the forest floor, leaving West Virginia Whites without their native foodplant. Interestingly, the butterflies will switch to using Garlic Mustard as a foodplant in the absence of toothworts, and may even prefer Garlic Mustard over toothworts. At first glance it seems like a fair trade off: replace one mustard with another and carry on. I mean, wouldn't stand to reason that the spread of Garlic Mustard would lead to a flourishing of West Virginia Whites, just as the planting of Crown Vetch (Securigera varia) along roadsides throughout southern Ontario has led to a drastic range expansion of Wild Indigo Duskywings (Erynnis baptisiae). In the case of the duskywing, which was once restricted to a small portion of southern Ontario, it has recently taken up the non-native vetch as a new larval foodplant and expanding its range as a consequence of this new widely available resource. In western North America, the naturalization of non-native Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) has allowed Anise Swallowtails (Papilio zelicaon) to produce produce two flights every year, when previously it produced only one. This shift from unvoltinism to multivoltinism in the swallowtail was assisted by the tremendous abundance of Fennel which augmented the supply of natural carrot family (Apiaceae) foodplants. In strong contrast, however, the abundance of Garlic Mustard has actually had a negative effect on West Virginia Whites.

Lab experiments and field observations in the American portion of the West Virginia White's range have shown that caterpillars which feed on Garlic Mustard never reach maturity, usually dying after several days. Garlic Mustard, though attractive as an ovipositing site to adult females, is actually a death sentence to any caterpillar unlucky enough to hatch there. The Garlic Mustard's chemical defenses and a suite of growth inhibitors in the plants kill all caterpillars by the time they reach their second instar. Or at least that's the case in most populations. In at least one Massachusetts  population, however, caterpillars are able to survive until the pupal stage by feeding on Garlic Mustard alone. Though the caterpillars took longer to pupate and were a third smaller than caterpillars that grew up on toothworts, they did survive. Perhaps other populations of West Virginia Whites may also be able to adapt to use Garlic Mustard.

There may be some hope for West Virginia Whites if other population can shift to using Garlic Mustard successfully. But that's not likely to happen soon enough to stop the decline of this species all across its range. Evolution is a long and often risky road, after all. It seems that combating Garlic Mustard where it has become established and keeping it from spreading into pristine woodlands in the first place is the best defense we can give West Virginia Whites. So I keep pulling and spraying Garlic Mustard in my woods and I keep hoping that the old colony of mine is still flourishing under those big trees half a province away, and not just in my memories.

Naturescape: Red-headed Weaver

A Red-headed Weaver (Anaplectes rubriceps) contorts its neck while tying knots into its complex nest.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Thursday, 4 August 2016

Naturescape: Sanderling

A Sanderling (Calidris alba) runs ahead of the surf on a California beach.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Wednesday, 3 August 2016

Tuesday, 2 August 2016

Naturescape: Beautiful Wood-Nymph

Two Beautiful Wood-Nymphs (Eudryas grata) put on a convincing disguise as bird droppings while they rest with impunity out in the open on a River Grape (Vitis riparia).
Photo: Mark Conboy


Monday, 1 August 2016

Naturescape: Early Morning at Gravelly Bay

Day breaks over Gravely Bay on Long Point, Ontario. The life of a professional ornithologist is punctuated by amazing sunrises on an almost daily basis.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Sunday, 31 July 2016

Naturescape: Edward's Hairstreak

An Edward's Hairstreak (Satyrium edwardsii) nectaring on a Butterflyweed (Asclepias tuberosa).
Photo: Mark Conboy

Saturday, 30 July 2016

Naturescape: Mantled Howler Monkey

A quizzical expression on the face of a Mantled Howler Monkey (Alouatta palliata) in Belize's remarkable Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Friday, 29 July 2016

Naturescape: Lichens

A variety of lichens coat rusty barbwire at an abandoned homestead in Frontenac Provincial Park, Ontario.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Thursday, 28 July 2016

Naturescape: Western Red-backed Salamander

A Western Red-backed Salamander (Plethodon vehiculum) plods its way through a lush temperate rainforest on the British Columbia coast.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Wednesday, 27 July 2016

Naturescape: Curve-billed Thrasher at Dawn

A Curve-billed Thrasher (Toxostoma curvirostre) lords over Organ Pipe National Monument at sunrise.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Tuesday, 26 July 2016

Naturescape: Amherst Island

A gloomy winter's day on Amherst Island, Lake Ontario.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Monday, 25 July 2016

Naturescape: American Black Bear

An American Black Bear (Ursus americanus) hunts Chum Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) along a creek on Vancouver Island's wet western coast.
Photo: Philina English

Sunday, 24 July 2016

Naturescape: Hawaiian Forest

Hawaiian Tree Fern (Cibotium menziesii) dominates the understory of this lush rainforest slope on the Big Island of Hawaii.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Saturday, 23 July 2016

Naturescape: Hippopotamus

A bull Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) displays his tusks to nearby females.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Friday, 22 July 2016

Naturescape: Zebra Swallowtail

This immaculate Zebra Swallowtail (Eurytides marcellus) was found at the Tip of Long Point, Ontario in June 2016. It was the first record of this species at Long Point since the 1970's (according to the Ontario Butterfly Atlas) and the first one in all of Ontario since 2012.
Photo: Mark Conboy

BioBrevia: Microscopic Ménages à Trois

A new and startling discovery shows that hitherto undiscovered yeasts may be part of some lichens.
Photo: Mark Conboy

In a refreshingly good piece of science journalism from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Emily Chung reports on the shocking discovery that some Bryoria lichens contain yeast, in addition to their photobioant (an algae and/or cyanobacteria) and known fungal component. How this went unnoticed for more than century is almost unbelievable; so not surprisingly, not all lichenologists are completely convinced yet. The full paper was published in Science, but you'll have to pay to read it.

Thursday, 21 July 2016

Naturescape: Crested Barbet

A Crested Barbet (Trachyphonus vaillantii) exploring my campsite in northern Botswana.
Photo: Mark Conboy

BioBrevia: Ancient Things Incredible

Some Trembling Aspen (Populus tremuloides) colonies in the Rocky Mountains are thousands of years old.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Check out this fascinating Ted Talk by Rachel Sussman on some of the world's oldest, and incidentally, weirdest, organisms. From the otherworldly Welwitschia mirabilis whose two massive leaves are never shed, even after centuries of growth, to the ridiculously ancient actinobacteria that remain active even in the coldest conditions of the Siberia tundra, it will blow your mind to meet some of the oldest organisms we share our little blue planet with!

Wednesday, 20 July 2016

BioBrevia: Comprehending Cuckoos

A victim of brood parasitism, an Eurasian Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) feeds a Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) nestling. The decline of Common Cuckoo means that this behaviour is becoming less common across Europe.
Photo: Per Harald Olsen (Wikimedia Commons)

A new paper in Nature Communications, Population Decline is Linked to Migration Route in the Common Cuckoo, by Hewson et al shows that Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) take two different routes from Europe to their African wintering grounds during autumn migration. The researchers used satellite telemetry to track birds in virtually real time as they made their way south. The data showed that birds which took the shorter route experienced higher mortality rates than birds that took the longer route. This differential mortality correlated to population declines on the British breeding grounds. It's further evidence that effective conservation of migratory birds must take into account migration ecology as much as breeding and wintering site ecology.

Naturescape: Darth Vader Fly

I've always called this massive horse fly the Darth Vader Fly, for obvious reasons. Measuring up to 3 cm long, Tabanus atratus is a very large for a fly, especially one that has razor-sharp mouth parts. I've never been bitten by one, but I'm sure it hurts like crazy!
Photo: Mark Conboy

Tuesday, 19 July 2016

Naturescape: Smooth Aster

Smooth Aster (Symphyotrichum laeve) in bloom on a dewy summer morinng in the Canadian Rocky Mountains.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Monday, 18 July 2016

BioBrevia: The Trout

Brown Trout (Salmo trutta)
Illustration: Knepp Timothy (Wikimedia Commons)

For your listening pleassure, Franz Schubert's Trout Quintet (a.k.a. Piano Quintet in A major, D. 667). This was the second of Schubert's works to be named after that venerable European fish, the Brown Trout (Salmo trutta). The first was the song Die Forelle (D. 550), German for The Trout, an allegorical piece warning young women away from the depredations of male suitors, framed as a struggle between angler and fish. The quintet's fourth movement is a series of variations on Die Forelle, thus the transference of the name between the two works. The kind of information that can nail a daily double on Jeopardy...

Naturescape: Common Snapping Turtle

Late spring is nesting season for Common Snapping Turtles (Chelydra serpentina) at Long Point, Ontario. This female is covered in sand from her long walk inland to search for a suitable nesting site among the sand dunes.
Photo: Mark Conboy

Sunday, 17 July 2016

Understanding Molt: A Bander's Perspective

The broad, round-tipped, thick flight feathers, sharply contrasting black and white primaries and alula, nearly unifromly white secondaries, and pure white primary coverts all indicate this Snow Bunting (Plectrophenax nivalis) is a male in definitive basic plumage, meaning that it hatched in at least 2014 (this bird was captured in January 2016). Molts and plumages are among the most important features used for aging birds during the banding process.
Photo: Mark Conboy

This primer on molt in birds is read by all new volunteers and staff at Long Point Bird Observatory (LPBO). This is the most basic level of understanding that banders are expected to have before they can begin work in the banding lab. This primer assumes that the reader has at least a basic understanding of feather terminology (i.e., what are the greater coverts versus median coverts).


In bird banding, a comprehensive understanding of the strategies, timings, and mechanics of molt is necessary for aging birds with accuracy and precision. Molt is a cyclic pattern of feather replacement, and is highly variable between species, and exceptions occur to almost all of the "rules" that follow, but in general terms:

  • Every species at LPBO molts all of its feathers at least once a year, usually after the breeding season.
  • Some species have an additional annual molt before the breeding season.
  • In most species, young birds molt differently than adults. For example, some species have two molts during their first 12 months of life, but only have a single molt every 12 month after that for the rest of their lives.
Note: The term molt is best reserved only for feather replacement that is part of a cyclic and predicable process, so that the growth of new feathers to replace randomly lost or damaged ones is not considered to be a true molt, but should instead be referred to as adventitious feather replacement.

In general, molt is usually symmetrical, meaning, for example, that a feather actively molting on the left wing is simultaneously molting on the right wing. Similarly, if the outermost tail feather is actively molting on the left side of the tail, the outermost tail feather on the right side should be molting simultaneously.

Molt usually occurs in a predictable sequence and that sequence is reflected in the numbering system we apply to the wing and tail feathers. All of the wing’s flight feathers and the tail feathers are numbered in the order which they typically molt.



Wing and tail feather terminology and numbering.
Illustration: Adapted from the North American Banders' Study Guide (North American Banding Council)

In most species, the primary feathers molt from the innermost to the outermost, and the secondary feathers molt from the outermost to the innermost. The tail feathers, properly called rectrices, molt from the innermost to the outermost.


In order to age birds you will need to know what patterns of molt each species uses. Read the molt section in Pyle for each species as you encounter them. Contained within the molt section is almost all of the information you need to age a bird. Pyle tells you what kind of molt(s) each species undergoes and when it occurs. Pyle also notes exceptional (eccentric) kinds of molts that don't fit the general patterns discussed below.


There are three types of molts that you will regularly encounter at LPBO: preformative, prebasic and prealternate. These types of molts can occur in several different arrangements or molt strategies. The majority of LPBO birds follow two particular molt strategies:


1. Complex Basic Strategy

Natal Down
ê
Prejuvenal Molt à Juvenal/First Basic Plumage
ê
Preformative Molt à Formative Plumage
ê
Definitive Prebasic Molt à Definitive Basic Plumage



2. Complex Alternate Strategy
Natal Down
ê
Prejuvenal Molt à Juvenal/First Basic Plumage
ê
Preformative Molt à Formative Plumage
ê
First Prealternate Molt à First Alternate Plumage
ê
Definitive Prebasic Molt à Definitive Basic Plumage
ê
Definitive Prealternate Molt à Definitive Alternate Plumage
ê
Definitive Prebasic Molt à Definitive Basic Plumage

Note: There are two additional molt strategies that are rarely used by species encountered at LPBO, so won’t be addressed in detail here: Simple Basic Strategy and Simple Alternate Strategy.

Though these diagrams may seem nebulous, especially if the terminology is new to you, they will become more clear as we examine each molt and each plumage in turn, below. Fundamental to this, is understanding that molts preceed plumages and plumages only arise from molts. A bird cannot change plumages without molting!

Note: Molts are named with the prefix “pre”; so that the molt which leads to a bird’s juvenal plumage is called the prejuvenal molt. There are other molt and plumage terminology systems in use, but the one presented here is the best and is the one in most widespread use among banders today.


We will examine all of the molts and plumages and outline, briefly, how they can be used to determine the age of a bird, beginning with natal down. Natal down is the first kind of feather that nestlings grow. Some species hatch fully covered in down (precocial), others hatch naked and subsequently grow down (altricial). The development of natal down is not considered a true molt. True molts actually begin with the next stage of feather growth.


The prejuvenal molt occurs in the nest. It leads to the development of juvenal plumage. The prejuvenal molt is sometimes also referred to as the first prebasic molt and juvenal plumage is sometimes called first basic plumage. At LPBO we tend use the more intuitive terms prejuvenal molt and juvenal plumage. The prejuvenal molt is unusual in that all feathers are grown at the same time, thus it is a simultaneous molt. All subsequent molts in a bird's life are sequential molts, meaning feathers are replaced a few at a time, not all at once.


Juvenal plumage is grown in the nest. Its primary function is to make young birds mobile so they can leave the nest, reducing the risk of depredation and giving them the ability to follow their parents while they forage. Juvenal plumage is short-lived, lasting for only a few weeks in most LPBO species, before being replaced by formative plumage. Juvenal plumage, aside form usually looking very different from all subsequent plumages that a bird will have, has particular characteristics that make it distinctive. Understanding these characteristics is imperative to aging birds in non-juvenal plumages (i.e., formative, basic, alternate):
  • Body feathers are whispy, with widely spaced barbs; they have the appearance of being low-quality feathers.
  • Primary feathers are usually narrow with a somewhat pointed tip.
  • Retrices are usually narrow and come to a noticeably pointed tip.
  • Flight feathers are usually dull coloured, with limited or no coloured edging.
  • Flight feathers and rectrices are usually thin, sometimes to the point of being translucent.
  • Growth bars line up across the wing and tail feathers.
  • Fault bars, when present, line up across the wing and tail feathers.
Recognizing the characteristics of juvenile feathers takes practice. In fact, all of these characteristics should be thought of in relative terms, so that juvenal feathers are more pointed than non-juvenal feathers. After handling many individuals of the same species you’ll begin to understand the relative differences between juvenal and non-juvenal feathers.

Note: Growth Bars are feather pigment bands that, when visible, can be useful for aging birds. Growth bars develop because daytime and nighttime metabolic processes take place at different rates in birds, so that pigment deposition is more concentrated during the day and less concentrated at night. In some species or individuals, growth bars can be difficult to see, but in other species or individuals they can be easily detected. Because the prejuvenal molt is simultaneous, juvenal plumage growth bars line up across the wing feathers and rectrices. Conversely, all other molts are sequential, so growth bars don't line up across the feathers that have grown during the preformative, definitive prebasic or prealternate molts. Growth bars in the rectrices need to be used with caution because it is possible for a bird in definitive basic plumage that accidentally lost its tail to adventitiously regrow those feathers simultaneously, in which case it may have growth bars similar to a bird in juvenal plumage. Fault bars are growth bars that developed during periods of stress, so that pigmentation is particularly weak. They are usually very obvious, but their occurrence is somewhat infrequent. In addition to being weakly pigmented, fault bars are also usually structurally weak, meaning they are prone to breaking, leaving the feathers looking unnaturally truncate. The same characteristics and cautions apply to fault bars as to normal growth bars.



Growth bars in Carolina Wrens (Thryothorus ludovicianus) and other wrens show up as dark bands on the wing feathers and rectrices. Growth bars are usually far less obvious in other birds, but the principle is the same. The top photo is of a bird in definitive basic plumage, showing dark growth bars slightly staggered on the wing feathers. The bottom photo is of a bird in formative plumage, showing dark growth bars that line up across the inner greater coverts and across the primaries and secondaries.
Photos: Marie-Anne Hudson (Piranga)

The preformative molt replaces the juvenal plumage with the formative plumage. The most important thing about the preformative molt is that it is typically a partial molt. That means most or all body feathers, but usually no primaries, secondaries, tertials or retrices are replaced (in some species a few tertials or the central rectrices may be replaced).

Note: Part 1 of Pyle doesn’t use the term preformative molt, but instead uses the term first basic molt. This volume was written before a new (and more accurate) terminology came into use. When Part 1 of Pyle says first prebasic molt, it really means preformative molt. When Part 1 of Pyle says first basic plumage, it really means formative plumage. You should attempt to always use the new terminology and not the terminology used in Part 1 of Pyle. Part 2 of Pyle, having been more recently published, uses the new terminology.


Formative plumage is roughly analogous to what most field guides call immature plumage. Understanding that formative plumage follows the partial preformative molt is crucial to aging LPBO birds! So, once again: typically, the preformative molt is partial, involving the replacement of only some juvenal plumage with formative plumage, while retaining other parts of the juvenal plumage. Here, the concept of molt limits becomes important. A molt limit is the contrast between different generations of feathers. In formative plumage a bird will show contrast between retained juvenal and replaced formative feathers. Detecting molt limts is the key to aging birds by plumage. Typically, molt limits occur in the wing feathers. In many LPBO species, juvenile primaries, secondaries, tertials and primary coverts are retained, while the greater, median and lesser coverts are replaced (fully or partly) by formative feathers. Thus there may be a visible molt limit between the retained juvenile feathers and replaced formative feathers in birds that have completed their preformative molt. Formative feathers are usually brighter in colour, rounder-tipped, broader, and thicker. In general, they look very much like definitive basic feathers (see below). When we detect a molt limit that's the result of a preformative molt, we know that the bird hatched in the most recent breeding season.



Myrtle Warbler (Setophaga coronata) in formative plumage. The primaries, secondaries, primary coverts and alula are retained juvenal feathers, while the greater and median coverts are replaced formative feathers. This molt limit, between the duller juvenal feathers and brighter formative feathers could only occur on a bird that hatched in the most recent breeding season.
Photo: Marcel Gahbauer (Piranga)

Note: When looking for molt limits, it is important to be aware of pseudolimits in some species. Pseudolimits are apparent contrasts between feathers, giving the impression of a true molt limit, but they are merely inherent differences between feathers of the same generation, thus are not indicative of a bird's age. Only a handful of LPBO species regularly have confusing pseudolimits, including many sparrows and Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma rufum).



Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma rufum) in definitive basic plumage. The apparent contrast between the inner and outer greater coverts is normal for Brown Thrashers in all plumages; it is a pseudolimit and is not useful for aging.
Photo: Peter Pyle (Piranga)

The definitive prebasic molt replaces formative plumage with definitive basic plumage. In contrast to the preformative molt, the definitive prebasic molt is almost always a complete molt in LPBO birds. Every single feather on a bird’s body is replaced during a complete molt: every body feather, every flight feather, and every rectrix. For LPBO birds, the definitive prebasic molt usually occurs on the breeding grounds, right after breeding is completed, though exceptions do occur. The reason the molt is called definitive is because it occurs every year of the bird’s life, except for its first year, when the preformative molt takes place at roughly the same time. The preformative molt occurs only once, replacing the juvenal plumage, while the definitive prebasic molt occurs every single year thereafter.


Myrtle Warbler (Setophaga coronata) in definitive basic plumage. All of the feathers of the wing are broad, round-tipped, and thick. There are no molt limits, meaning that this bird hatched not in the most recent breeding season, but at least in the season before that.
Photo: Marcel Gahbauer (Piranga)

Definitive basic plumage is roughly analogous to what field guides call adult plumage. It differs from formative plumage in that no juvenal plumage is mixed in with the basic feathers. When a bird is found to have only definitive basic plumage we know that it is one that hatched not in the most recent breeding season, but at least in the season before that. It is impossible to age most LPBO birds with any more precision than that because the definitive basic plumage occurs in birds that are one year old, two years old, three years old, etc; it is the same every year following the preformative molt. Definitive basic plumage has particular characteristics that make it distinctive from juvenal and formative plumages. Understanding these characteristics is imperative to aging birds:

  • Body feathers are tight and crisp with dense barbs; they have a high-quality appearance.
  • Primary feathers are usually broad and a fairly rounded at the tip.
  • Retrices are usually broad and come to a noticeably truncate end.
  • The feathers of the wing are usually colourful, usually with thick coloured edging.
  • Flight feathers and rectrices are usually thick.
  • Growth bars do not line up across the wing and tail feathers.
  • Fault bars, rarely present, don't line up across the wing and tail feathers.
Like with juvenal feathers, recognizing the characteristics of definitive basic feathers takes practice, and should be thought of in relative terms, so that definitive basic feathers are less pointed than juvenal feathers, for example. After handling many individuals of the same species you’ll begin to understand the relative differences between definitive basic and juvenal feathers.

The complex alternate molt strategy has two additional types of molt that are not part of the complex basic strategy. These are called prealternate molts and they result in the development of alternate plumages, which are roughly analogous to the breeding plumages illustrated in field guides. Less than half of LPBO species have a prealternate molt and in all cases it's a partial or incomplete molt. Prealternate molts usually take place on the wintering grounds either in winter or early spring.


Note: In banding terminology there is an important distinction between partial and incomplete molts. As discussed earlier, partial molts include most or all body feathers, but usually no primaries, secondaries, tertials or retrices are replaced (in some cases a few tertials or the central rectrices may be replaced). By contrast, incomplete molts usually include the replacement of all body feathers as well as some primaries, secondaries, tertials and/or rectrices. Partial prealternate molts are far more common among LPBO species than are incomplete prealternate molts.


The first prealternate molt is partial (or in some cases incomplete) and results in the first alternate plumage. The first prealternate molt replaces some feathers of the formative plumage. The first prealternate molt usually is limited to feathers of the head as well as the greater, median and/or lesser coverts in many LPBO species. In other species, such as American Goldfinch (Spinus tristis), almost all of the body feathers will also be replaced, but such extensive molts are not the norm for LPBO species. Incomplete molts may also include some primaries, secondaries, tertials and/or rectrices. Birds in first alternate plumage may thus show molt limits between three generations of feathers in their wings (e.g., juvenal primaries, secondaries, tertials and primary coverts, formative outer greater coverts, and first alternate inner greater coverts, as seen in some Myrtle Warblers [Setophaga coronata]). When we detect molt limits that are the result of a first prealternate molt, we know that the bird hatched in the most recent breeding season.



Myrtle Warbler (Setophaga coronata) in first alternate plumage. The primaries, secondaries and primary coverts are retained juvenal feathers. The second outermost greater covert is a formative feather, while the rest of the greater coverts and median coverts are first alternate feathers. These molt limits, between three generations of feathers, duller juvenal feathers, a slightly brighter formative feather, and brightest first alternate feathers, could only occur on a bird that hatched in the most recent breeding season.
Photo: Marcel Gahbauer (Piranga)

Like the first prealternate molt, the definitive prealternate molt is partial (or in some cases incomplete); it results in the definitive alternate plumage and replaces some feathers of the definitive basic plumage. The definitive prealternate molt is usually also limited to feathers of the head as well as the greater, median and/or lesser coverts in many LPBO species. But there are cases when body feathers, primaries, secondaries, tertials and/or rectrices are replaced. Birds in definitive alternate plumage show molt limits between two generations of feathers in their wings (e.g., definitive basic primaries, secondaries, tertials, primary coverts and outer greater coverts, and definitive alternate inner greater coverts). When we detect molt limits that are the result of a definitive prealternate molt, we know that the bird hatched not in the most recent breeding season but at least in the season before that.


Myrtle Warbler (Setophaga coronata) in definitive alternate plumage. All of the feathers of the wing are broad, round-tipped, and thick. The primaries, secondaries and primary coverts are definitive basic feathers, while the greater coverts and median coverts are definitive alternate feathers. A molt limit of this kind means this bird hatched not in the most recent breeding season, but at least in the season before that.
Photo: Marie-Anne Hudson (Piranga)

Note: There is another type of molt that is rather rare among North American songbirds, which I haven't yet addressed: the presupplimental molt, which leads to the supplimental plumage. Presupplimental molts can vary widely between species. For example, one species may molt only wing feathers, while another species may molt only body feathers; thus, presupplimental molt is sort of a catch-all term which is applied to any molt, whether it be partial, incomplete or complete, that occurs in addition to the prejuvenal, preformative, prebasic and prealternate molts. Only two LPBO species are known to undergo presupplimental molts of any consequence: Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea). Refer to Pyle for details about aging these species.

When aging birds by molt, put all of the above information together to decide what age to give the bird:
  1. Read the molt section in the species account in Pyle so you know what to look for at a given time of year.
  2. Eliminate all plumages you are not likely to encounter at the time of year.
  3. Open a wing and look at the primaries, secondaries, tertials, primary coverts and greater coverts in particular, for molt limits. Determine molt limits by comparing the shape, colour, thickness and amount of wear between feathers.
  4. If molt limits are present, determine if they are the result of a preformative molt or a prealternate molt. If molt limits are not present determine if the feathers are uniformly juvenal or non-juvenal.
  5. Open the tail and look for molt limits. Determine molt limits by comparing the shape, colour, thickness and amount of wear between feathers. Pay particular attention to the central and outer rectrices.
  6. If molt limits are present, determine if they are the result of a preformative molt or a prealternate molt. If molt limits are not present determine if the feathers are uniformly juvenal or non-juvenal.
  7. Look at the body feathers. Determine if the body feathers are juvenal or non-juvenal. Use the plumage criteria given in Pyle to see if additional clues about age can be found in the colours of body, wing feathers and rectrices.
  8. Look at other characteristics such as colour of the eyes, orbital skin, legs, beak and/or mouth lining. Determine if the bird has a gape, is in breeding condition, and/or if the skull is completely ossified (look for these last three criteria at the appropriate time of year).
  9. Come to a final decision about the bird's age based on a combination of criteria.
If there is conflicting evidence for age, it may be necessary to make a decision based on the strength of one criterion over another. In general, the most reliable plumage features (for a suitably experienced bander) are the wing feathers. Adventitious replacement or extreme wear of rectrices can result in confusion, so I prefer to use rectrics in combination with other plumage criteria, namely the wing feathers, when possible. Body feathers can be deceiving to inexperienced banders who expect males to always be brighter than females and visa versa - this is not necessarily the case, especially with the warblers! The use of non-plumage characteristics should not be overlooked, especially skull ossification, which with practice, can be the most accurate way to determine a bird's age.

There are plenty of additional resources about molt:
Piranga (NatureInstruct)
North American Banders' Study Guide (North American Banding Council)
The Variety of Molt Strategies (Steve N.G. Howell)
Finding Order Amid the Chaos (Steve N.G. Howell)

As you read through these documents, and as you begin to work in LPBO's banding lab, you will see that aging birds by molt is far more nuanced and fraught with exceptions than I've presented here. This makes banding a source of perpetual learning and challenge, something that any serious bander will embrace, rather than dismay.